badpara.blogg.se

Davinci resolve m1 performance
Davinci resolve m1 performance











davinci resolve m1 performance davinci resolve m1 performance

At the time that was twice the cost in Canada of getting the Studio Max. IGPU handling all the stuff the 3090 doesn't know how to. Resolve has supported decoding HEVC 4.2.2 on the IGPU since I think 17.1.Īn I7/I9 with a 3090 is just that much more powerful. If your need is HEVC 10 4.2.2 you don't need a 3090. For me it was a choice between getting Studio Max or a new PC with 3090 etc that does not have the same range of decode/ encode in hardware and cheaper. On my PC the GH6 5.7K 60P files will not play but on the Studio Max plays just fine in multicam with UHD 60P file from GH5S. SkierEvans wrote:The value to me of getting the Studio Max was the hardware decoders and encoders. Regardless of what flavor of raw I tried.Ĭan this be due to the free Davinci version? Or 32GB of memory? It played 1fps, if at all, and export time for 2 min clip shot to over an hour. What did surprise me was that Noise reduction completely killed the Mac. RAW was quicker to transcode and export on the PC, while working with the h. Win PC (Render time - clip duration - clip type) These were the results for proxy generation (DNxHR LB, auto resolution): I tested a friends 32 GB version with free Resolve version on these features:Īnd tested this against my 2019 Win PC (core i9 3.6GHz, 32 GB ram, nVidia 3060). I am currently buying the M1 Max and deciding between the 32 and 64 GB memory version.













Davinci resolve m1 performance